November
2007
email2 USMarshallJustinPayton re RidiculousThreatAssessment
After US Marshall Deputy J_P_ left a voicemail and I left him a voicemail to leave me his email I didn’t hear from him for awhile and decided to guess at his email address…I may or may not have figured it out…but here’s the email text sent to him and copied to relevant federal personnel…(DoJ US Attorneys Rachel Paulose, Adan Perez; FBI Special Agent Tim Gossfeld). The idea here is that I think it’s safer to communicate in writing vs being in a conversation and having anyone twist my words into something not really said, but that they can use against me if I can’t untwist them…sort of like Asst US Atty Michelle Jones was thinking when she stated that I had twisted her words (6/19/07 audio)…except in this case I hadn’t and had audio recorded proof that I hadn’t…which they resent for some reason…
Dear Deputy J_P_,
Per the U.S. Marshall Service’s definition of a threat as “any action, whether explicit or implied, of intent to assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere…” rest assured, I have not posed and do not pose any threat to anyone; with one very appropriate understanding…the opposition to any federal agency or employee that any concerned American citizen might or should have to:
1) being lied to, deceived, stonewalled, etc., in multiple ways regarding multiple material aspects associated with a supposed ‘criminal investigation’ of ‘color of law’ and vulnerable adult abuse, mistreatment & torture.
2) not being allowed to provide material evidence of intentional tampering of evidence per significant, and likely incriminating, differences between County Sheriff Office jail video as provided to me versus true, correct, accurate raw footage, or a true, correct, accurate copy thereof.
3) refusals by superiors of the federal employees who lied to me, deceived me, etc., to address in any way the fact that I had been lied to, deceived, etc., and that there is clear proof thereof.
4) being ordered out of a building and threatened with calling the police by federal agents in their wrongful attempts to refuse to accept a simple FOIA request legally delivered.
5) being told that obvious criminal acts against me under color of law, and under vulnerable adult law, such as torture, cruel and inhumane treatment, mistreatment, plus false entries in jail and jail medical logs and incident reports, etc., are not criminal:
a) When, in the United States, torture is clearly and without exception declared by law and by the President to be a crime, and,
b) When, torture is clearly defined by the United States itself as being equal to:
J an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering upon another person within his custody or physical control, and,
J “severe mental pain or suffering” means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering, and,
b) When, torture is clearly defined by international treaty to which the United States is signatory as being equal to:
J Any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as punishing him for an act he has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity, and,
c) When, acting under color of law as public officials acting in an official capacity, jail deputies, leadership, and nurses intentionally inflicted severe physical pain and mental suffering for over three hours to punish me for an act I committed, or to intimidate or coerce me, or for any discriminatory reason of any kind, such as but not limited to knowing I suffered from mental illness, which,
d) They did, as clearly evidenced by over three hours of video clearly showing that for virtually the entire time I cried, begged, and pleaded for mercy, for relief from severe pain, screamed out in agony from the extreme pain, and clearly identified to multiple personnel that I was in pain and why I was in pain, and,
e) Those personnel recognized that I was in pain, and stated they would get the nurse, but that no one ever entered my cell to check on why I was in agony in violation of multiple rules and laws to the contrary, and,
f) Those personnel intentionally, and through specific decisions with clear evidence, allowed the severe pain to continue throughout the whole ordeal, and,
g) Experts such as County criminal and internal affairs investigators and leadership stated clearly that I was in pain, severe pain, for most of the whole time, and that the jail personnel knew it, and stated that no one would fault me for using the word torture to describe the severity of pain and agony that I was in, and stated that this was all clearly evidenced by the jail footage they inspected, and stated that what I said happened, happened, (i.e. in the minds of professional law enforcement/investigative personnel I didn’t make this up and I didn’t exaggerate), and,
h) Some jail personnel have provided statements which are not protected by Garrity, or other compelled statement protections, which also corroborate the facts above, and are therefore available as criminal evidence, then,
i) Torture was committed under color of law, and can be proven, and,
j) Torture was committed against a person in their care, therefore,
k) The universally deplored and illegal act of torture was committed, therefore,
l) The Department of Justice has the responsibility to properly investigate the act of torture and those who committed and/or witnessed it via questioning, interviewing, interrogating, and all other means, and,
m) Those who did the act of torture must be held accountable by the United States Attorney’s Office who must by law file charges against and prosecute those who committed the torture under the Constitution, the laws of the United States, and international treaty.
[Not to mention the whole refusal to allow me to provide evidence of evidence tampering, and refusal to acknowledge or investigate other federal crimes associated with what County personnel did, etc.]
Beyond this, quite simply, I pose no physical, verbal, written, or other inappropriate threat of any kind to anyone. I have no such desire. All I want is for truthfulness, openness, and honesty to prevail…especially where it hasn’t…which is pretty much all over the place…as you can see… (e.g. DoJ M_J_ stated both that jail personnel were talked to as part of her non-‘investigation’ and that she has no information from any entity other than myself, other than what I have provided. Since I have interviewed none of the jail personnel involved on June 9, 2006, M_ J_’s statements are absolutely and unequivocally contradictory. One of her statements is true; the other is a lie. There are additional instances of pure lies, deceptions, etc.)
To whatever extent anyone suggests, truthfully or not, that they feel threatened (and I think the odds of some misrepresentation, per an unstated agenda more along the lines of attempting to intimidate, discredit, etc., certainly exist here too), I would suggest that their feeling is more akin to that of the child who fears he might get caught in a lie from having had his hand in the cookie jar, denying it, and then realizing by the taste on his lips, and the look in mom’s eye, that mom is noticing those tasty crumbs on his lips. That sense of anxiety over being caught, with evidence to back it up, is of his own doing and is his own fault to deal with, and mom is behaving and communicating appropriately to the extent that she calls him on his misbehavior. Same goes for the likes of M_J_, A_P_, R_P_, certain FBI agents, and far too many other DoJ personnel. (Same goes for City, County, etc., but my understanding is that that’s not your area of concern.)
In other words, in order to assign me an appropriate, accurate threat risk number, your MOSAIC system needs to extend the range of assigned numbers beyond 1 – 10, to include 0.
Sincerely,
M______
xxx.xxx.xx48
| Rate it: |
 Email it
|
      |
|
